During National Depression Awareness Month, we wanted to take some time to discuss the very normal stress and mental health challenges working families experience as we are increasingly connected to our jobs. As our connectivity to work has grown – between email, texting, chats, phone calls, video conferencing calls, and a myriad of social networking sites – so has the challenge to separate work from our personal lives. Employees are spending an increasing amount of time both at work and thinking about work. Habits such as checking email during a family dinner or ruminating about that email that you’d forgotten to write in bed at night are common experiences for many. Add on top of that a child who’s acting out and a parent who needs a little extra care both physically and financially, and you have a recipe for stress that affects your own health and mindset, as well as potentially relationships with family, friends or colleagues.

Employee assistance programs (EAPs) have been adopted by many employers to reduce the impact of mental health disorders, workplace stress and other work/life issues on workplace productivity. Despite the ubiquity of this employee benefit, which is offered by 97 percent of large employers, utilization hovers around five percent industry-wide. A primary barrier is the stigma of utilizing EAP programs, which were historically grown from occupational substance abuse programs.

While great strides have been made in reducing stigma, a great opportunity lies in changing the premise that stands in the way of employees tapping into services that might help them move forward and find their best self. What if we were to fundamentally remove the premise that there are people with “issues” and people without? The reality is that every employee is faced with their own brand of “juggle,” and stress and anxiety continue to be on the rise as working families live increasingly busy lives.

As Magellan transforms the EAP benefit for modern day workers and their families, we’re driven to provide resources and tools to help people address their mental health challenges before they severely impact their lives and productivity. The pivot lies in helping employees take care of their mental health as a practice of self-improvement and in helping employers position EAP services in their culture of well-being.

There are three essential components to powering this shift in the transformed EAP:

• Clinically-validated online programs and mobile apps that help employees track and change habits and mindsets
• When employees experience a bump in the road, convenient access to a coach or therapist that can fit into their harried day
• Content that inspires, motivates and helps employees feel validated in the normalcy of their stress and feel connected to others tackling similar experiences

Imagine a world where employees give each other a high five for taking some “me” time, leveraging a convenient method of choice, just as they do for someone sticking to their gym routine or running their first 5k. We certainly do!

The full extent of this remarkably negative 2016 Presidential campaign might surprise you. Studies show that the campaign may have had a profound effect on the mental wellbeing of many people. This goes beyond the usual split of people who feel excited or disappointed following the outcome of any election. Across the country, healthcare providers are reporting an increase in patient stress.

It should be noted, this is not simply a result of the conclusion of the campaign. In October, the American Psychological Association reported that 52 percent of American adults identified the 2016 election as a very or somewhat significant source of stress. Worryingly, that announcement was based on a survey conducted in August when the final, and most contentious, part of the campaign was just getting started.

According to the APA survey:

• Across party lines, those registered as Democrats (55 percent) and Republicans (59 percent) are statistically equally likely to say the election is a very or somewhat significant source of stress.
• Nearly 4 in 10 adults (38 percent) say that political and cultural discussions on social media cause them stress.
• Men and women are equally likely (51 percent vs. 52 percent, respectively) to say the 2016 U.S. presidential election is a very or somewhat significant source of stress.
• Millennials and “matures” are the most likely to say the election is a very or somewhat significant source of stress (56 percent vs. 59 percent, respectively) — significantly more than Generation Xers (45 percent) but not boomers (50 percent).

In fact, the APA found that people were so stressed that it saw the need to release coping tips relating to the election.

Interestingly, given the result of the election, researchers have found that stress is not just limited to liberals. In an article for Wired, Maimuna Majumder a computational epidemiology research fellow for HealthMap at Boston Children’s Hospital explained that “some findings are consistent across red, blue, and swing states. Among them is the fact that increased searches explicitly for “presidential election” seem to be associated with searches for depression and anxiety, which suggests that the 2016 presidential election cycle may have been a source of emotional distress for Americans, irrespective of political leaning.”

Where is this election stress having an impact?

Day-to-day, one of the most noticeable places where this stress is felt is in the workplace. A noticeable change in this election, compared to those in the past, is a willingness to discuss it at work. In the APA survey, nearly half (47 percent) of all respondents said people are more likely to discuss politics in the workplace this election season than in the past. With these types of discussions happening in the workplace, employers are rightfully concerned about what all of this is doing to their workforce.

In short, a high level of employee stress does not lead to an engaged, productive workforce. In fact, the result is very much the opposite. According to a study by Fairleigh Dickerson University, “Workplace stress costs U.S. employers an estimated $200 billion per year in absenteeism, lower productivity, staff turnover, workers’ compensation, medical insurance and other stress-related expenses.” Other estimates, put the number at more than $500 billion. Studies have shown that businesses with a high-stress or high-pressure environment spend as much as 50 percent more than average on healthcare. There is also a strong link between high employee stress and low employee engagement.

Supporting Employees through External Stressors

Whether it is an election or a traumatic event or emergency, there are always going to be external events that are impossible to control. It is however, feasible to provide an environment and toolkit for employees to allow them to better manage their stress levels and emotional well-being.

Employers should lean on their Employee Assistance Programs (EAP) to provide resources for employees who are feeling stressed by the election (and the rest of the news cycle). This can range from simple advice about how to manage stress to more holistic therapy options. An EAP can also provide guidance and training for management-level employees for creating a cohesive and inclusive workplace.